Section: Module 3: Grading | CSCI6121: Secondary PSI Teaching Methods for Computer Science | NJCTL

Main course page
  • CSCI6301 Secondary PSI Teaching Methods for Computer Science

    Welcome to PSI Teaching Methods for Computer Science

    Teachers will learn how to use research-proven approaches to create a highly effective and welcoming learning environment for their students. Pedagogy topics include social constructivism; meta-cognition; differentiation; and remote learning. Policy topics include grading based on mastery; why homework should not be graded; and providing retests to encourage continuous improvement.

    Prerequisite: None

Module 3: Grading

  • Module 3: Grading


    Grading is something that is fundamental to every class that a teacher teaches. In this module, we will examine the PTI grading philosophy which includes allowing students to retake assessments, grading only assessments and labs, and using a grading correlation.

    This module’s short answer assignment asks you to describe the current grading practices and policies in your classroom. Which pieces of these are district mandated? What steps can you take towards moving to align with the PSI-PMI philosophy of grading and retakes? What challenges do you anticipate? What benefits do you anticipate?

    1. Examine current grading practices in your school/classroom.
    2. Develop steps you can take towards shifting to a PSI-PMI’s grading philosophy including retakes, grading assessments only, and curving.
    3. Create a letter explaining the grading philosophy to parents and students.

    Required Readings:

    Dueck, M. (2011). How I Broke My Own Rules and Learned to Give Retests. Educational Leadership,69(03), 72–75.

    Fisher, D., Frey, N., &Pumpian, I. (2011). No Penalties for Practice. Educational Leadership, 69(03), 46–51.

    Wormeli, R. (2011). Redos and Retakes Done Right. Educational Leadership, 69(03), 22–26.

    Recommended Readings:

    Reeves, D. B. (2008). Teaching students to think: Effective grading practices. Educational Leadership, 65(05), 85–87.